Added: Cordelia Caroll - Date: 15.09.2021 07:16 - Views: 40402 - Clicks: 817
Young Australians are peppered with advice and threats over the dangers of sending explicit images of themselves. But experts say both the law and the curriculum is lagging behind experience, and too often girls take the blame and face the shame. When Erin was 17, she went along to a seminar with her year 11 class where she was told not to photograph herself naked — and definitely not to send such a picture to someone else.
An older woman who had experienced first-hand how badly it could go wrong warned that repercussions could come at once, if the image was shared without her consent, or in the future, if it came to the attention of potential employers. This was coming from a fairly liberal and progressive school. Then in person, that makes sex better. But she sometimes worries that those she has teen girls nudes in the past may one day be circulated without her consent.
For the best part of a decade, young women like Erin have been told by police, parents and schools not to take any photographs that they would not want shared with the world. They believe the issue should be approached from the perspective teen girls nudes harm reduction, and that only those who share the images should face repercussions, not those who take them. And they say society learns to see nude selfies — of both teenage girls and boys, not to mention adults — as neither demeaning nor empowering, but simply a part of life.
But one of the challenges is changing the conversation when the curriculum and the law are already well out of step with the technology and the culture. Figures for the prevalence of sexting are hard to come by. Teenagers spoken to by Guardian Australia suggested that it is far from universal, and more common among older teenagers in relationships. Some of them have seen that with their own eyes, Ellie says.
Nobody really asked. Many also initiated or enacted romantic relationships on social media. Two in five teenagers — and particularly older girls — were using Snapchat, a photo- and video-sharing app where messages disappear after a maximum of 10 seconds. Images can be captured as screenshots but the sender is notified and doing so is seen as a social faux pas. If it sounds mundane, it is.
Somewhat paradoxically, Snapchat is where you might share images that are too intimate or too banal for other social media platforms. Though the intention is to regulate explicit images of children, not consensual behaviour between children, if you are under 18 and photograph or film your naked body, the effect may be the same.
In some cases, this is at odds with the age of consent. Some teenagers spoken to by Guardian Australia were aware that this was the law, but not all. Police are continuing to investigate a websitebelieved to be hosted overseas, which encourages Australian students to explicit images of their female peers. But while several young people have been convicted under similar laws in the US, the likelihood of an Australian teenager being charged with creating or sharing explicit images is slim. Inin one of the few cases in Australia to emerge publicly, an year-old man from western Sydney was charged over exchanging naked teen girls nudes semi-naked pictures with a year-old girl.
There was no indication that the man had shared the images, nor that their relationship had been physical. He was eventually released on a good behaviour bond, without an offence recorded. The discrepancy is illustrative of a law that aims to police the culture of taking intimate images, rather than the crime of sharing them non-consensually. The repercussions of having a selfie shared without consent are far more likely to be social than criminal, and disproportionately borne by women.
In an organisation called ThinkUKnow — a partnership between the Australian federal police, NineMSN, and Microsoft Australia, among others — produced a two-minute video warning young people about the dangers of sexually charged or explicit photos. The girls react with disgust; the boys smirk. Megan flees from the classroom in tears. How they will affect you?
Think again. Boys — and men — take and share images of themselves naked, but without the same stigma; even those who illicitly share those they are sent typically experience fewer repercussions than the women pictured.
He says that perspective is only reinforced by the absence of teen girls nudes. This double standard is felt keenly by young women, who are more likely to be told not take intimate images of themselves than their male peers are to be told not to share any they are sent.
The current approach of prohibition-as-prevention does young people of both genders a disservice, Watson says. For a generation that communicates visually, photos are limitless in the meanings they can convey. We say that about Kim Kardashian all the time. Since 2 Novemberno one can be prosecuted in the state for taking explicit images of themselves. It is also not an offence if you are under 18 and no person pictured is more than two years younger than you, and the photo does not depict a serious criminal offence.
But Albury is clear that the issue should be principally approached from the perspective not of criminality, not of prohibition, but of harm minimisation. But for as long as it persists, young women need to be taught how best to assess the risk of taking them. The current approach of telling young women not to take such photos is failing on both fronts: practical and ideological. Australia news. Nude selfies: what if they are just an ordinary part of teenage life? Young women have been told not to take any photographs that they would not want shared with the world. Picture posed by model.
Elle Hunt. Wed 31 Aug . Topics Australia news Crime - Australia Australian education features.
Reuse this content.Teen girls nudes
email: [email protected] - phone:(924) 333-1135 x 9934
Nude selfies: what if they are just an ordinary part of teenage life?